Meteo Service Forum

Weernieuws => Seizoensgebonden => Topic gestart door: TMCThomas op wo 20 nov 2019 - 16:28

Titel: A Remarkable Analog: 2002
Bericht door: TMCThomas op wo 20 nov 2019 - 16:28
A Remarkable Analog: 2002
Posted on November 18, 2019

(https://i.postimg.cc/hjJNmQvb/t2m-djf-2002.png)

On November 18, the World Climate Service issued its seasonal forecast and discussion for winter (December-February) 2019-2020 in the U.S. and Europe. WCS seasonal outlooks include an overview of expected climate anomalies, key drivers, and risk factors for the upcoming three-month season, and our forecast document contains detailed discussion of available predictors, including dynamical model forecasts and statistical and analog guidance.

Analog analysis has long been a staple of the WCS methodology for seasonal forecasting, and we invariably rely on diverse sets of analogs derived from numerous aspects of current global climate patterns. Only on rare occasions do we focus on individual analog years, because the climate phase space is rarely a very good match to any previous year in the modern history in more than a few respects; there are nearly always significant differences from any candidate analog year. Moreover, the degrees of freedom in the climate system are too numerous to expect a close correspondence with any past year to continue into the future, and so any search for "the perfect analog" is a fool's errand (even if the climate were assumed to be unchanging).

Nevertheless, the latest WCS seasonal forecast report discusses a very notable confluence of similarities between the present climate and that of winter 2002-2003. In keeping with usual practice, the WCS winter forecast is not unduly influenced by the 2002-03 analog, but the degree of similarity is so striking that it is worth considering the 2002-03 outcome as a plausible outcome and risk scenario for winter 2019-20. The following list of similarities was presented in the forecast document and is reproduced he


(https://wp.worldclimateservice.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/z500_200210.png)

(https://wp.worldclimateservice.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/z500_201910.png)


The most significant difference between 2002 and 2019 is that 2002 had more warmth in the eastern equatorial Pacific and much less in the West Pacific; El NiƱo was more classical (East Pacific) rather than Modoki-like. There was also much less anomalous warmth in the subtropical and northern North Pacific in 2002.

(https://wp.worldclimateservice.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/sst_stdanom_200210.png)

(https://wp.worldclimateservice.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/sst_stdanom_201910.png)

In view of the extensive and remarkable similarities betweeen 2002 and 2019, it is tempting to conclude that winter 2019-2020 will be closely analogous to 2002-2003, with a strongly blocked pattern, unusual cold in the eastern two-thirds of Europe and the eastern United States, and reduced precipitation and wind in central and northern Europe (see below). However, as noted above, the WCS approach is to treat individual analog years with caution, regardless of how impressive the similarities appear to be. The combined consensus of a large array of dynamical and statistical predictors is a more reliable guide to likely seasonal patterns, and the WCS forecast is constructed accordingly, but the winter of 2002-2003 should be regarded as a plausible alternative scenario.

(https://wp.worldclimateservice.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/mslp_djf_2002.png)

(https://wp.worldclimateservice.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/t2m_djf_2002.png)

(https://wp.worldclimateservice.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/pcp_djf_2002.png)

(https://wp.worldclimateservice.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/wnd100_djf_2002.png)

Bron: World Climate Service (https://wp.worldclimateservice.com/home/2019/11/18/a-remarkable-analog-2002/)